While I agree with Daniel Guich about the value of a degree from an Ivy League school versus a state school, tuition at state schools has far outpaced inflation. I recall paying $900 for one quarter at the University of Cincinnati, or $2,700 a year, in the 80s. In-state tuition at UC today is over $13,000. That's relatively cheap compared to other state schools, but using an inflation calculator, $2,700 in 1986 equals $7,600 today. Tuition at UC is double that!
But telling new graduates that they should expect low pay but immense job satisfaction is unrealistic. You have to be able to pay your bills. If we continue to pay new grads so little that they can't pay for their loans, they will look for employment in other fields.
I think we need to adjust our thinking about how we charge for our work and pay everyone in our profession more of a living wage.
------------------------------
Dawn Zuber, FAIA
Studio Z Architecture
Plymouth, MI
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-31-2023 05:38 PM
From: Daniel A. Guich Jr
Subject: Professional Development
I do not see the point or see the value of getting an architecture degree from an Ivy league these days and even back in the time I was considering schools. I went to state schools for a very low cost and don't regret it. I had very small loans that were manageable for an architect's salary. I remember watching a video when applying for student loans where they said "borrow only what you will make in one year's entry level salary", that was the big take away for me and helped make my decision. If you really want to go to a private and expensive university, it's on you and no firm should be catering or adjusting their salaries for those who spent a fortune to be an architect. At the end of the day it's the individual and their skills and value that a firm will evaluate and offer a fair salary regardless of the school and student loans. I don't really care about the school label. I want someone to perform at what they have been hired for.
Original Message:
Sent: 10/30/2023 1:34:00 PM
From: Shane P. Martin AIA
Subject: RE: Professional Development
I have not seen that level of fee for entry level in the Denver market and simply couldn't entertain it. It isn't a sustainable baseline, especially for a small firm. Certainly not here.
And I'm completely on board with the idea that the cost of an education v. potential/lifetime income is brutal. We're planning college for our 16 year old right now and it's staggering. But unless there's a magical change in fee structures and what we can start charging, I would resist the idea that starting salary needs to match that imbalance for education costs.
------------------------------
Shane Martin AIA
Arrow B Architecture
Centennial CO
Original Message:
Sent: 10-26-2023 11:26 PM
From: Michael R. Perez AIA
Subject: Professional Development
Greetings,
Based on experience, I have seen extreme differences in how the current generation has felt about paying unreal amounts of money for education to get them ready to work in a firm. As a hiring manager, I often have to be the first to let them know that they do not meet the minimum requirements for a $100k salaried drafter, which I am told is what their instructors set as expectations upon graduation. The candidates are seeing $100k+ of student debt to get their Masters degrees and needing the high salary to even pay their high interest rate student debts. How are the rest of you addressing this? What do your conversations look like? Can your firms afford the competitive rates, and if so, which part of the nation are you able to?
------------------------------
Michael Perez AIA
PMKC Leadership Group
------------------------------