For many years I've worked in an IPD-ish environment. We still had the traditional architect-owner and contractor-owner contracts, but the contractor was on board in the schematic design phase. This gave the owner a much more reliable source for project construction costs, and gave the design team a good constructability reference.
The value of having a team like this is what everyone makes of it. I've seen some that had contractors that tried to bully everything in a preconceived direction, I've seen others that stayed out of most design discussions. What seems universal is that the GC swears that he's familiar with the type of building and everything that is required, but after the drawings are complete finds a way to add to the GMP total. (The items weren't on the incomplete drawings).
Unfortunately, the Value Engineering process still takes place after the drawings are complete - this should be done at the end of the Design Development phase.
I'm comfortable working with this arrangement, and actually prefer it over the design/bid/build method. I'm not so sure I'd like to be in the same contract with the GC. I'm thinking of sharing liabilty over issues that I have no control over
-------------------------------------------
Klaus Steinke AIA
Las Vegas NV
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 09-20-2010 07:06
From: Thomas Gragnano
Subject: Integrated Project Delivery
The Crate and Barrel chain of retail stores uses Revit and IPD for all of their new construction. We recently had a lunch and learn presentation by their Sturctural Engineers explaining the process.
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Gragnano AIA
Architect
Morris-Berg Architects, Inc.
Charlotte NC
-------------------------------------------