The closest I have seen in my experience is Forteweb from Weyerhouser. It is an online wood member design software that provides framing options per your loading and span conditions. Check it out: https://www.weyerhaeuser.com/woodproducts/software-learning/forte-software/. I wonder if there is something similar for concrete and steel? I would start at the ACI and ASIC web sites to see what resources they have. For heavy timber, check out Woodworks.org.
Original Message:
Sent: 06-19-2023 07:29 PM
From: Zichu W. Wang
Subject: looking for structural software
Thank you Daniel. Yes it's definitely something I could use. I do remember the pains of navigating RISA. A consistent feature of these tools is that they are good at analyzing a known frame. I wonder if there are tools that can take a massing model and recommend a framing. Perhaps the tech isn't there yet.
Original Message:
Sent: 06-19-2023 05:38 PM
From: Daniel A. Guich Jr
Subject: looking for structural software
Hi Zichu,
Have you looked into Clear Calcs at https://clearcalcs.com/. They are probably what you are looking for. Architects use them to get a basic idea on the structural portion of their design concepts, etc. In graduate school I used Visual Analysis which is way easier than SAP, ETABS, and/or Risa.
Best,
------------------------------
Daniel Guich, NCARB, CDT, LEED ap
Original Message:
Sent: 06-06-2023 09:32 PM
From: Zichu W. Wang
Subject: looking for structural software
TL;DR - Can anyone recommend software products that automate structural framing in (early) design phase?
With my naive belief that structural framing in *typical* buildings is rather formulaic (or maybe at the conceptual phase), I'd imagine I could provide a building type and a desirable span to some algorithm that could give me the appropriate loads, layout and rudimentary sizing.
Over the years my designer colleagues have echoed the same sentiment. So are there products that can skip the heavy-punchers like SAP or ETABS? Can conceptual phase framing be done by a tool like parking by TestFit, for example? Something simpler and cheaper but still tested, appropriate for fast, iterative designs. I've once seen TT CORE showing off Asterisk. Has anyone had any experience with it? It looks like it's in open Beta perhaps
------------------------------
Zichu Wang
EDG Architecture and Engineering
Scarsdale NY
------------------------------