Not an uncommon problem years ago, but in today's market your situation is not as common. It is more common today to eliminate/prohibit the roll-over of large amounts of paid time off. Phrased another way, the most prevalent policy - in my experience - is "use it or lose it." Suggest you talk with your accountant soon and make some changes.
In my experience (both practice and consulting) you have multiple issues at play - human/talent issues, workplace wellness, financial, legal.
In simple terms:
a. vacation package - determine if you have "vacation" paid time off or if you have "personal" time off. The distinctions include whether or not you have designated vacation (typically/conceivably voluntary time off), sick (conceivably somewhat involuntary time off - employee's do not decide "I will get sick next Tuesday"), personal leave (e.g., my spouse is traveling and I want to say home with the family for two days, etc. On a detailed note, I suggest you clarify if your employees earn "one day per month" (i.e., 12 days/year) or "two weeks/10 days" per year earned on a pro-rata 1/12th basis each month. It's a 20% swing on your benefit/liability amount.
b. mandatory vs. customary/voluntary - determine with your legal and other advisors to what extent you are required by law or regulation (e.g., union agreement for field surveyors as an example) to provide certain benefits.
c. roll over - as a senior principal in a firm (we were large to put the comments in perspective) we decided to phase out "roll over." Not unlike your situation, we had multiple folk who seemingly "never took vacation." We had two fundamental reasons - First and foremost, we wanted the employees to take care of themselves, which included taking time off (in candor, this was a mutually beneficial motive). Second, we were aware of the financial implications, both current and long-term and did not want to have would was/could become an unwieldy liability. We used a two year interim to phase out the roll-over. In year one, the rule was "at the end of this year, no employee can have/carry-over more than two times his/her paid time off allocation." That is, if you were a typical "two weeks per year" employee you could roll-over up to four weeks. In year two, the roll-over was one times your annual accrual, so at the year end you could roll-over up to two-weeks paid time off. Thus, in year three the roll-over was eliminated, and there was only roll-over for special, prior approval "emergency" or "extenuating circumstances" issues. In hindsight, two years was a long time; however, we felt it best to let employees phase in over a longer time (primarily because some had as much as 6-weeks of unused time, and we did not want to "lose" them or force them to take up to two months off - both emotions and financial issues, including revenue generation.
d. accounting liability - check to assure that you are following generally accepted/required accounting principles and practices. We recognized pragmatically, and in the states in which we practiced the law required, that paid time off was a CURRENT liability (any employee could in fact take the vacation time off, or if they left the firm we owned them the money on departure. Thus, there can be big impacts on balance sheet and other financial considerations. In my view, it is best to keep the current liability appropriately low, which includes limited/no roll-over of unpaid.
e. wellness - finally, we found that once the predictable "resistance to change of any kind" sentiments reduced (which they did relatively quickly) all recognized the value of the "no roll-over" policy. In fact, people did schedule and take time off in a reasonable manner, which produced the results desired of paid time off policies.
Willing to discuss further with anyone who wishes.
Best to all,
Scott Braley
-------------------------------------------
Scott Braley FAIA
Principal Consultant
Braley Consulting & Training
Atlanta GA
404-252-9840
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 01-12-2015 10:17
From: Stephen Alexander
Subject: accrued vacation
We are a 35 member firm established in the mid 60's. We offer a pretty standard vacation package of 1 day of vacation pay earned for each month of employment. After 5 years you get an additional 5 days.
We have always allowed people to carry over any unused vacation into the next year but now we have accumulated an obligation of 268 weeks of accrued vacation time.
We would like to change our policy moving forward to put some type of limit on how many days someone can carry over to the next year and what happens to the days that exceed the allowable carry over.
We would certainly appreciate some input as to what the rest of the architectural world is doing.
Thanks in advance!
-------------------------------------------
Stephen Alexander AIA
AG Architecture
Wauwatosa WI
-------------------------------------------