Committee on the Environment

  • 1.  Are native plants ugly?

    Posted 08-23-2011 09:02 AM
    I couldn't think of a more catchy subject line but I have heard architects dismissing indigenous plants as not good looking enough for their projects. What do you think? Should we call good looking Hollywood celebrities instead of our neighbors in the next neighborhood grill? Apologies for the sarcastic pot-shot but it is the harsh reality. 
    Here's more on my blog.
    http://www.archisage.net/profiles/blogs/native-vs-exotic-landscaping

    Please chime in...


  • 2.  RE:Are native plants ugly?

    Posted 08-24-2011 01:43 PM
    It is hard to imagine an ugly species of plant - maybe individual specimens - but not a whole species, let alone an entire ecosystem.  But, beauty is a cultural phenomenon.  Hence we see extensive grass lawns still used in the arid southwest because estates in the northeast were built that way and cultural standards have not adjusted to local reality.  In Austin, TX, however, we have seen a decided shift towards native plants, which are not only drought tolerant, but colorful and available in varied shapes and sizes.  And native plants are now the landscaping materials of choice in this area, so they are readily available at nurseries.  And native plants are more adapted to and for the native fauna.  (Deer resistant plants are all the rage in my neighborhood.) Any landscape architect worth hiring should be able to advise you on native plants, their availability, and their appropriate use.

    -------------------------------------------
    David Schele AIA
    Felder Group Architects Inc
    Austin TX
    -------------------------------------------








  • 3.  RE:Are native plants ugly?

    Posted 08-25-2011 10:25 AM
    David S. makes a good point--hardly any plant is ugly in its context. The idea that native species are ugly comes from two places:

    1) We easily tire of what we see all the time. If we live in a pine forest, we get tired of pine trees, even though to someone from the prairie, pine trees are beautiful and refreshing.
    2) We are easily seduced by anything 'exotic'--the very definition of non-native species. Why is imported marble better than marble from Carthage, Missouri? Because it's imported. Same goes for plants.

    Until we can overcome our boredom with the familiar and our attraction to the exotic, or at least manage those two traits, I'm afraid that native plants will always seem 'ugly' to many.

    -------------------------------------------
    David Greusel FAIA
    Overland Park KS
    -------------------------------------------








  • 4.  RE:Are native plants ugly?

    Posted 08-28-2011 02:01 PM


    -------------------------------------------
    Lydia Straus-Edwards AIA
    San Diego CA
    -------------------------------------------
    One of the advantages in the use of native plants is that the resultant appearance avoids the homogeneity in design approaches throughout the USA and even throughout the world that I find so objectionable.  When the design limitations of native plants are to severe, then a basis of natives with very selective inclusion of exotics is a sound approach.  Recognition that there are no ugly plants, just as there are no ugly colors, is essential to a good design approach, as all is a matter of context.







  • 5.  RE:Are native plants ugly?

    Posted 08-29-2011 01:52 PM
    For anyone doubting the importance of native plantings, I would suggest reading BRINGING NATURE HOME, by Douglas W. Tallamay, 2007 Timber Press

    -------------------------------------------
    Franklin Brown AIA
    Ohio School Facilities Commission
    Fredericktown OH
    -------------------------------------------








  • 6.  RE:Are native plants ugly?

    Posted 10-31-2011 02:26 PM
    When this topic was first posted a few months ago, I corresponded with several members of this forum privately about using the National Wildflower Center as a resource.  I neglected to post this link to the forum.
        http://www.wildflower.org/

    The National Wildflower Center was started by Lady Bird Johnson and has grown into a national repository of information on native plants.  Click on the "Visit" tab to see an extensive set of demonstration gardens at this research center.  There is also a section that includes links to major resources in the other states.  On the "Explore Plants" tab select the "Organizations" button to search for agencies specific to your area of the country.


    -------------------------------------------
    David Schele AIA
    Felder Group Architects Inc
    Austin TX
    -------------------------------------------








  • 7.  RE:Are native plants ugly?

    Posted 11-01-2011 10:10 AM



    I live and practice on the east central coast of Florida in an ecologically sensitive area that is easily impacted by use of non-indigenous plants and landscape techniques, especially the extensive use of lawns and non-native "pretty" plants.  These plants and practices require extensive irrigation, fertilization, and pesticides to maintain, and most of these materials ends up in out waterways and lagoon system.  The effects of these practices is devastating to our waterways and eco-systems.  Even though we are considered to be a "wet region" with plentiful rainfall, most of the rainfall is during the summer months and the balance of the year can actually be quite dry and near arid.  Drought tolerant native species have adapted to the periods of high rainfalls and then months without rainfall at all.  We have developed a landscape design concept that we have referred to as "Florida Zen".  It utilizes Florida Native species and materials (sand, crushed cocquina and solid stone, and very few but very selected "non-natives" that have exhibited characteristics for drought tolerance and the ability to thrive without irrigation or fertilizers or pesticides.  These plantings are typically sparingly use as accents and focal points.  Any plant that does not survive due to drought or other, is removed and replaced with something that can survive.  Everyone who has seen these landscapes loves them, and we have used them in everything from modest homes to million dollar homes.  What we have found is that until people (designers included) have seen options other than want they have become accustomed too, they have difficulty imagining something different.  Even architects (whose training is in the design of the building or residence, has not received much training in the landscapes that can actually enhance their project.  It only requires some additional education.  No one feels that a Japanese Zen Garden is ugly, and it is made up of native plantings indigenous to the area.  Native plantscapes are the same, just different materials suitable to the specific area and arranged to do the same that our building designs are intended to do, create beauty, move the eye, create a focal point, etc.  I believe that as we as architects and designers learn more about the beauty of the palette of natural plant species available to an area, we will find the ways to incorporate them into our projects that enhance their beauty, not detract from.  As some point, just looking at a landscape "design" that has and requires adverse impacts on the local ecology, will be considered UGLY.


    -------------------------------------------
    Lawrence Maxwell AIA
    Spacecoast Architects, P.A.
    Indialantic FL
    -------------------------------------------







  • 8.  RE:Are native plants ugly?

    Posted 11-01-2011 03:01 PM


    -------------------------------------------
    Polly Osborne AIA, LEED AP
    Osborne Architects
    Los Angeles CA
    -------------------------------------------

    I tried to think of a funny answer but I got serious by accident:
    Ugly is a relative subjective.  Plants are neither ugly or beautiful in the world of nature.  Plants have meanings deeper than ugly or beautiful.  Architectural choices should also have meanings deeper than ugly or beautiful. What is the meaning of Place? Site? Context?  It is questions like these that can make beauty more than skin (or bark) deep.  History started before mankind.