Hello All ---
Is this item is the one that goes back to the Architect doing 4-plexes for a regular Client?
As I recall:
One group of houses was designed by "Architect A", as usual. Then the Owner got "Architect B" to use the plans of "A" for construction-phase services on the first build. Then, "B" was to use "A"'s plans on a second multi-building site for permitting and construction!
IF SO:
First, are field services required in that area? Here, such services start at 5 units. (Accessibility Code starts at 3 units.)
But, to me:
1. Number of Units:
That wouldn't matter to me. NO WAY, is someone else using my plans for field services!
2. Construction Permit, Phase 2:
That's even crazier; NOT A CHANCE... My plans are not to be submitted under another Architect's name!!!
3. Client?:
If Owner is going-ahead w/ my plans, I'd insist on a waiver, or maybe-even simply "returning the plans" (I know, he could've made copies), along with a waiver (incl.: "no copies made").
4. No luck?
If Client won't sign a waiver, I'd make sure the permitting authority knows what's going on. The Owner might have put my name on the permit application (I've had that happen). And, my name might be on the field reports.
5. Go-away fee?:
If Client offers to pay me to go away, and I accept it, I'm in deeper doo-doo. Yes, this is one of those wonderful deals where we spend a lot of time-&-money, to earn zero.
6. And, of course, don't forget:
a. Consult w/ your attorney.
b. Consult w/ your professional insurance folks.
c. Discuss this w/ local AIA + State licensing dept., and national, AIA.
d. Possibly discuss with State Attorney General.
e. If it gets hairy, contact a good local news source (paper, TV, blogs).
Goooood luck.
Sincerely ---
Bill
william j. devlin aia, inc.
ARCHITECT
Springfield, MA