Practice Management Member Conversations

 View Only

Community HTML

Clouds

Quick Links

Who we are

The Practice Management Knowledge Community (PMKC) identifies and develops information on the business of architecture for use by the profession to maintain and improve the quality of the professional and business environment.  The PMKC initiates programs, provides content and serves as a resource to other knowledge communities, and acts as experts on AIA Institute programs and policies that pertain to a wide variety of business practices and trends.

    

  • 1.  Permit Sets

    Posted 01-10-2017 09:01 PM

    Well all this banter from practitioners with government jobs and from the comfort of academia intrigue me.

    You all need to get in gear with what is really happening in the industry and with Design Build and Developers.

    I guarantee that if you get a set of documents from and AE for Permit it is not complete.

    In my close to 40 years of doing this I don't think I have ever gotten a comment on a detail from an AHJ.

    Your living in a dream world and need to get into the new century.

    And what if you, the AHJ, actually have an important comment that has to be incorporated into the documents.

    Good luck with that since they are going right into construction!!!

     

    Dennis O'Beirne AIA, LEED®AP

     

    Associate-Architecture Manager

    dd +1 248 936 8062 

    email dennis.obeirne@ibigroup.com  web www.ibigroup.com

     

    IBI Group

    25200 Telegraph Road-Suite 300

    Southfield MI  48033  United States

    tel +1 248 936 8000 ext 51026  fax +1 248 936 8111

     

    Logo

     

    NOTE: This email message/attachments may contain privileged and confidential information. If received in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail message.



  • 2.  RE: Permit Sets

    Posted 01-11-2017 07:32 PM
    Edited by Rudolph M. Beuc III AIA 01-11-2017 08:24 PM
    I am the third generation of my family in this practice. I have myself been licensed and sealing my own documents for my own clients since 1996. When filing for permits, every set is as complete as I can make them.

    We are all human, we are all fallible. There will always be some grey area or need for improvement. There is always something marked on the documents that I may need to address or not.

    If there needs to be a revision or addendum, I will create such and issue a new set. The AHJ has to have a decent set of documents on record to review and compare built conditions to. That is, to fulfill their responsibilities.

    I do not hold a government job, nor am I in an institutional ivory tower. I am a one horse shop. I meet with clients, I do my own drawings (Revit models), I seal and sign my own drawings, and I answer my own phone. I do not live within a government, corporate, or other cocoon.

    I can not for the life of me, sir, wrap my head around your comments.

    ------------------------------
    Rudolph Beuc AIA, NCARB, CBO, Architect,
    R. Beuc Architects Saint Louis MO
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Permit Sets

    Posted 01-12-2017 06:45 PM

    In my practice world in the NJ Meadowlands drawings go for multiple reviews. First for site plan and zoning, which often takes the longest time for approvals, especially if there is anything controversial about the project.

     

    Then come the building code reviews: general construction and the applicable subcodes for MEPF. Subcode reviews are often done by part-timers who also work for other jurisdictions. We have to catch them on the right days of the week to resolve any questions. The drawings follow a daisy-chain process so that any review comments or incomplete submission to one official slows down the entire timeline.

     

    Our AE design team members, try to meet with the relevant code officials early in the preliminary design phase to resolve any questionable issues, to get reviewers confidence that we know what we are doing and they will not be burned (bureaucratically speaking), and to be clear to address all important code requirements that might be design drivers going forward to completion. I was surprised when I did not see this preliminary design face-to-face suggested in other comments.

     

    Over the many years I practiced here I have built up a professional rapport and trust, that has served my commercial clients interests well, since wasted time is money. This is not about cronyism. I have often found code officials helpful. The jobs are as code compliant as we know and the efficient approval process reflects well on us as design professionals. Now working for select clients in semi-retirement I can still rely on this system to get the job done and approved expeditiously.

     

    Edward R. Acker |AIA |LEED AP

    106 Clevenger Court

    Winchester, VA 22601

    703.635.8968

    EdAcker39@comcast.net

    P  Please consider the environment. Do not print this message unless necessary.

     






  • 4.  RE: Permit Sets

    Posted 01-12-2017 07:06 PM
    First of all, this is a great conversation about a question that always comes up on almost all projects in my experience. Some projects had a Permit Set and then a Construction Set that incorporated all plan check comments for the contractor to reconcile cost for the owner. On other projects the Bid Set was also the Permit Set which made our lives way easier. 
    There is one thing that was not mentioned in this thread is that you can submit a "Revision to the Building Permit". I have done this in the past when the scope of a project changed significantly after the Permit Set was submitted and it impacts the life safety, structural or mechanical components of the facility. There are always going to be changes after the Permit Set has been submitted, specially on large commercial or multi-family projects. 
    I am for having one Permit/Bid or Construction Set just for streamlining the process and not have to track several sets of drawings, but sometimes you have to break the sets up just to keep up with the every decreasing project time frames clients are proposing these days. 

    ------------------------------
    Daniel Guich, LEED AP, CDT
    San Francisco, CA
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Permit Sets

    Posted 01-12-2017 07:07 AM
    Some of these comments scare me.  AHJ means authority having jurisdiction.  As such any comments they make on submitted plans must be reflected in reissued documents for their review and sign off before a permit is issued.  This is consistent with every jurisdiction I have done projects in.  Permit sets are documents that are issued for construction in my experience.  I have never seen an AHJ allowing submittal of documents with any qualifier notation.  The best advise is to sit down with the AHJ to determine exactly what they need and then provide that to them.  Bantering on these forums about what others sees seems like a lot of extraneous banderol when a simple answer can be obtained direct from the source. 

    ------------------------------
    Kerry Hogue AIA
    HKS, Inc.
    Dallas TX
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Permit Sets

    Posted 01-12-2017 12:56 PM

    We had somebody die in a building collapse in our town; about a month ago.  A demolition permit was issued to an individual, not a construction company.  There were no plans, just a permit to do "demolition".  The nonsense of issuing permits for work that is not fully coordinated and sealed by a responsible party has to stop.

     

    MSHA column       Robin Miller, NCARB, AIA

           Chief Executive Officer

           MSH Architects

           Ph: (605) 332-7850

           www.msharch.com ICC Logo.jpg aia-logo

     

    MSH Architects retains rights to any attached drawings or data.