Nikolaus
why is it either or? While I disagree with you, I think we can and should be doing both. In some parts of the world construction of new human shelter is necessary. In the U.S., let's exhaust our opportunities for extended use and adaptive reuse before we build anything new.
------------------------------
Mike Mense FAIA
Architect, Writer, Planner, Painter
mmenseArchitect
mensenyc on Instagram
Hamilton Heights, NYC
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 05-26-2022 05:08 AM
From: Zigmund Rubel
Subject: Bob Berkebile Q&A in Common Edge
AIA reported remodeling being 50% of US billings: https://www.aia.org/articles/6502007-renovation-claims-50-share-of-firm-billing. This is in inline with population growth: https://usafacts.org/state-of-the-union/population/?msclkid=44b56f18e4c81e25f0150d97db89c629.
This is in line with your suggestion.
Respectfully
------------------------------
Zigmund Rubel FAIA
A Design+Consulting
Greenbrae CA
Original Message:
Sent: 05-24-2022 05:37 PM
From: Nikolaus Philipsen
Subject: Bob Berkebile Q&A in Common Edge
While logically convincing, from a global perspective not building new buildings appears to be quite unrealistic given the projections of population growth.
Better to influence how to minimize impact of new construction.
------------------------------
[Klaus] Philipsen FAIA
Archplan Inc. Philipsen Architects
Baltimore MD
Original Message:
Sent: 05-23-2022 01:20 PM
From: Kira Gould
Subject: Bob Berkebile Q&A in Common Edge
There has to be an enormous, critical reason to build a new building in the next five to 10 years. We ought to find every way possible to create longer use of what we've already built and adaptively reuse the built environment that we own, rather than build a new one, because right now we can't afford the carbon.
https://commonedge.org/bob-berkebile-that-was-the-brilliance-of-leed-it-included-everyone-in-the-conversation/
------------------------------
Kira Gould
Kira Gould CONNECT
Oakland CA
------------------------------