The Construction Contract Administration Knowledge Community (CCA) has been established to help our members better understand the issues, actions and resultant impact of the decisions required in this often neglected part of Project Delivery. It is our goal to provide clear answers to issues of concern to the Institute’s membership and share case studies and best practices. We further hope to provide guidance and direction in developing guidelines for new and evolving approaches to Project Delivery as well as guidance in the continuing education of our emerging young professionals.
How to connect
- Join to get occasional emails with new content and resources.- Post on the discussion board to ask questions and share ideas.- Read a CCA white paper - or contribute your own!- Attend an upcoming event such as webinars and conferences. - Provide feedback on what you'd like to see from your CCA community at firstname.lastname@example.org.
This should be an "informational submittal" or "an informational submittal for the Owner's record."
I did not see the original question when this came through my feed.
Yes, "deferred submittals" or "delegated design" submittals are not simply "for the record". They must be reviewed for design intent and our engineers also do "a sniff test" to make sure that the calculations make some sense in the scheme of the overall building. But, it is important to make the distinction in both your documents and also your contract what the responsibility is of the architect/engineer in this case. For "Design Assist" we are typically stamping; for "delegated design", someone else is stamping. So be clear about that intent first.
And then, your specifications should list if this is an action or informational submittal. Generally these are action submittals for us to review and stamp. We state very clearly that in delegated design, we are reviewing for design intent only and the review does not nullify the responsibility of the subcontractor. We've revised our stamp to cover this condition.