I feel the simplicity of the question - The Case for Open Source ignores practical aspects that prevent its adoption. It is an important question. I think the answer has more to do with the business model than the technology.
Open source is wonderful. I feel it requires customization to the unique need of the application. Hourly billed jobs do not support the use of open source because the clients will not pay for this customization. This is where the commercial software companies have value because they've listened to our needs and customized their software to how we can more easily use it.
The open-source community has flourished because users and creators share their solutions openly and that is the change our community needs to make. This is not sharing our intellectual property of how we developed the solution, rather, the process so others can find similar or different outcomes.
Our profession can become more embracing of open source if they can share tool solutions that they've used with the community, like with
Blender, or
Python, We've used R Studio and
Shiny is one such community. We all need to help one another so we're not starting a project with the proverbial blank open-source tool. The community gives others the fruits of their labor.
One final thought. So many things are powered by
Linux. It is an important contribution that we can take a page from.
Lets start sharing more,
Zig
------------------------------
Zigmund Rubel FAIA
CEO
A Design+Consulting
Greenbrae CA
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-15-2021 10:34 AM
From: Rudolph Beuc
Subject: The Case for Open Source
<<If this is truly the case, should our industry look at creating tools that rely on open source resources?>>
No , the industry should look at supporting efforts that are already in place.
Some of the tools out there...
?????? FreeCAD?? - CAD software
?????? ?? https://www.freecadweb.org/
?????? Blender - A rendering, modeling, and animation software
?????? ?????? https://www.blender.org/
?????? BlenderBIM - A BIM addon for Blender
?????? ?????? https://blenderbim.org/
?????? GIP - A photo editor
?????? ?????? https://blenderbim.org/
?????? Inkscape -?? A vector graphice editor
?????? ?????? https://inkscape.org/
?????? Scribus - Desktop publishing
?????? ?????? https://www.scribus.net/
Thanks,
Rudy Beuc
??????
Original Message:
Sent: 10/13/2021 1:46:00 PM
From: Joel Martineau Assoc. AIA
Subject: The Case for Open Source
As our industry continues its digital transformation, I've noticed that my firm's reliance on software companies to produce the tools we desire to succeed is increasing. With licensing costs rising, deployments and updates becoming harder to manage and a sense that developers aren't creating tools that meet the specific needs of the architecture industry, it's no wonder some companies are beginning to develop their own software. This begs the question, if the tools being developed are useful to all of us, why are these development efforts siloed?
I've heard several times that when it comes to intellectual property, it's not the tool that brings competitive advantage, but how you use the tool that makes the difference. If this is truly the case, should our industry look at creating tools that rely on open source resources? This would allow us to not only crowdsource solutions and improvements, but improve interoperability. If data is our new currency, allowing everyone to access information with tools that are available to even the smallest of firms makes sense to me. What are your thoughts?
------------------------------
Joel Martineau Assoc. AIA
Senior Business Solutions Analyst
Stantec
Washington DC
------------------------------