The AIA Project Delivery Knowledge Community (PD) promotes the architect’s leadership role in all project delivery methods by assembling and distributing knowledge and best practices for a variety of project delivery methods, e.g. design-build (DB), integrated project deliveries (IPD), and public-private partnerships (P3).
"CM at Risk" is no different from a contract for construction between an Owner and Contractor. In other words, a "CM at Risk" is a Contractor. Calling himself a Construction Manager does not change anything about the contractual relationship with the Owner, nor does it affect project delivery. If the CM were functioning only as an adviser, then the relationships would be different.
Methods of project delivery include:
Construction Management where the CM functions as an ADVISOR, not as the Contractor
Can you clarify your request? How exactly is the project to be delivered? Which of the contractual relationships does the Owner prefer?
As far as format is concerned, you should use UniFormat to organize the project information. CSI published a document called PPDFormat in 2010. It explains how to write an RFP using UniFormat. If you want to know more, I'm happy to help.
Cliff Marvin, AIA Assoc., CSI, CCS, LEED-AP
Robert Schwartz & Associates
image003.gif@01CD964C.04229AB0"> image006.gif@01CD964C.04229AB0"> image004.gif@01CD964C.04229AB0">
212.691.3248, x15 office
Absolutely not true, Clifford-there really is a HUGE difference between a Construction Manager and a traditional Design-Bid-Build General Contractor. Per the AIA A133 Agreement Between Owner and CM, the CM at-Risk relationship requires the following (emphasis mine):
"§ 1.2 Relationship of the Parties -- The Construction Manager accepts the relationship of trust and confidence established by this Agreement and covenants with the Owner to cooperate with the Architect and exercise the Construction Manager's skill and judgment in furthering the interests of the Owner; to furnish efficient construction administration, management services and supervision; to furnish at all times an adequate supply of workers and materials; and to perform the Work in an expeditious and economical manner consistent with the Owner's interests."
This is the exact polar opposite of a traditional Design-Bid-Build General Contractor's vendor-relationship with the Owner.
The trick, however, is for we architects to not only know the difference among delivery alternatives, but to proactively help our client draft and properly administer CM at-Risk Contract Documents as open-book, fee-based, early teamwork to the benefit of our mutual client. That is the only way to achieve actual professional collaboration in the Owner's interests, not the traditionally adversarial old GC's self-profit model that you are referring to.
If we architects don't understand project delivery relationships, everything will revert back to the needless conflicts and other problems common to old fashioned D-B-B contracts.
We owe it to our clients to do better. See my attached white paper on the subject titled "If We Keep On Doing What We've Always Done...", as recently published on the AIA CCA Knowledge Community website. I welcome questions and comments.
Dale L. Munhall, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP
Senior Associate, Director of Construction Phase Services
8600 Indian Hills Drive, Omaha, NE 68114-4039
T 402.391.8111 F 402.391.8564 D 402.390.4482 C 402.670.2078
PLANNING ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING INTERIORS
Don't forget IPD
Marc Chavez FCSI AIA CCS CCCA
1301 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101
Marc.Chavez@perkinswill.com | LinkedIn
perkinswill.com | Blog | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram
For more clarification on the very important differences in contractual relationships between a conventional design-bid-build contractor, and Construction Manager as Advisor, and a Construction Manager as Constructor, as well as other commonly used PDMs such as the different forms of IPD, refer to the AIA Contract Relationship Diagrams, October 2015. I just posted this to the PDKC Library for quick reference.
There is another variation of the CM model that has been left off of the list. The missing evolution profile is CMGC and / or CMGC At Risk.
Richard Bryant, AIA
Alta Vista Design Architecture & Planning LLC