Committee on the Environment

 View Only

Community HTML

ALBION DISTRICT LIBRARY BY PERKINS + WILL IS A 2018 COTE TOP TEN RECIPIENT. IMAGE: DOUBLESPACE PHOTOGRAPHY

Quick Links

Who we are

The Committee on the Environment (COTE®) is an AIA Knowledge Community working for architects, allied professionals, and the public to achieve climate action and climate justice through design. We believe that design excellence is the foundation of a healthy, sustainable, and equitable future. Our work promotes design strategies that empower all AIA members to realize the best social and environmental outcomes with the clients and the communities they serve.

Enjoy our latest on COTE news (and follow us on X and LinkedIn). 

To learn about the Framework for Design Excellence (formerly the COTE Top Ten Measures), click here.

Check out COTE's history and timeline. 

Starting a local COTE or sustainability group and need some guidance? Check out the AIA COTE Network Resources here.

A big thank you to our 2024 sponsors: 
Founding sponsors: Building Green
Premier sponsors: Sherwin-Williams
Sustaining sponsors: GAF Roofing, Milliken, Andersen Windows,
BlueScope Buildings
Green sponsors: EPIC Metals
Allied sponsors: TLC Engineering, Sierra Pacific Windows

Expand all | Collapse all

Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

  • 1.  Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 01-26-2017 03:38 PM

    Is there any response from the CAE  to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

     

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/america-first-energy


    Do we believe in "clean coal" and fossil fuel and the apparent removal of incentives for alternative fuels?

     

    Will there be any activism from this committee?

     

    An America First Energy Plan

    Energy is an essential part of American life and a staple of the world economy. The Trump Administration is committed to energy policies that lower costs for hardworking Americans and maximize the use of American resources, freeing us from dependence on foreign oil.

    For too long, we've been held back by burdensome regulations on our energy industry. President Trump is committed to eliminating harmful and unnecessary policies such as the Climate Action Plan and the Waters of the U.S. rule. Lifting these restrictions will greatly help American workers, increasing wages by more than $30 billion over the next 7 years.

    Sound energy policy begins with the recognition that we have vast untapped domestic energy reserves right here in America. The Trump Administration will embrace the shale oil and gas revolution to bring jobs and prosperity to millions of Americans. We must take advantage of the estimated $50 trillion in untapped shale, oil, and natural gas reserves, especially those on federal lands that the American people own. We will use the revenues from energy production to rebuild our roads, schools, bridges and public infrastructure. Less expensive energy will be a big boost to American agriculture, as well.

    The Trump Administration is also committed to clean coal technology, and to reviving America's coal industry, which has been hurting for too long.

    In addition to being good for our economy, boosting domestic energy production is in America's national security interest. President Trump is committed to achieving energy independence from the OPEC cartel and any nations hostile to our interests. At the same time, we will work with our Gulf allies to develop a positive energy relationship as part of our anti-terrorism strategy.

    Lastly, our need for energy must go hand-in-hand with responsible stewardship of the environment. Protecting clean air and clean water, conserving our natural habitats, and preserving our natural reserves and resources will remain a high priority. President Trump will refocus the EPA on its essential mission of protecting our air and water.

    A brighter future depends on energy policies that stimulate our economy, ensure our security, and protect our health. Under the Trump Administration's energy policies, that future can become a reality.

     

     

     

    Sally Grans Korsh

    FAIA, LEED AP

    202.861.2571 main

    612.310.3881 cell

     

     

     



  • 2.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 01-31-2017 05:39 PM
    I agree with Sally Grans-Korsh, FAIA, that this statement needs an AIA/COTE response 
    Just because this administration's statement says "America First" does not mean it is truthful, and does not mean it is in the best interest of American citizens and our environment.  
    Martha Peck Andrews, FAIA

    ------------------------------
    Martha Peck Andrews FAIA
    Portland, Oregon
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 02-02-2017 08:44 AM
    Continued investment in fossil fuels is short sighted. New oil and gas infrastructure only continues to pollute. News is spreading already about the price of water going up beyond the reach of some people. When all the water is polluted only the rich will have clean water. We need to invest in efficient solar power now. 

    --
    matt wills, AIA
    FOUNDarchitects
    Lincoln, Nebraska





  • 4.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 02-07-2017 09:44 AM
    Edited by Maggie Brown 02-07-2017 09:43 AM
    The America First Energy Plan is a joke and an international embarrassment. It was written by the coal, oil and gas industries without any consideration to the enormous environmental and health impacts of carbon-based energy sources, or the future economic potential of renewable/sustainable energy supply sources. The U.S. with this so-called plan has given up its international leadership in the fight against climate change, and its opportunity to grow the economy through clean energy jobs. But guess what, this plan does not even matter and it is dead on arrival <g class="gr_ gr_38 gr-alert gr_gramm gr_run_anim Grammar only-ins replaceWithoutSep" id="38" data-gr-id="38">because</g> any forward thinking company, utility, state government, etc....already knows and has committed to a clean energy future and economy, so the momentum is on our side.

    What the architectural profession needs to do is to double-down on designing net zero energy ( carbon ) buildings and communities and not worry about the "head in the sand" administration, that does not seem to care about the future of the planet, future of the U.S. economy or the future of our children.

    Michael J. Holtz, FAIA
    LightLouver LLC
    Boulder, Colorado

    --
    Michael J. Holtz, FAIA, NCARB, LEED AP
    Founder and CEO
    LightLouver LLC

    Phone:     303 834 0414
    E-mail:     mholtz@lightlouver.com
    Web site: www.lightlouver.com





  • 5.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 02-10-2017 11:15 AM

    I agree with everything Michael Holtz with one exception, This is not a "head in the sand" administration.  This Administration is far more dangerous to the environment than we will ever imagine from our current world view.  And the damage they can do won't be offset by net zero buildings, even if that is all we build from today on. 

     

    There must be wide spread, persistent, vocal LOUD RESISTANCE.   Every lie Trump and his cronies throws out for the consumption by the masses, must be challenged and aired. 

     

    We cannot become the ones with our "heads in the sand"!    

     

    Ben Wilson

    Bargmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc.

    Boston, MA 

     






  • 6.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 02-14-2017 09:38 AM
    We at AIANY made statements that came from various committees. The COTE one, authored by Justin Pascone, was:
     

    AIA New York Position Statement

    Sustainability and the Environment

    Context:

    In 2014, U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions totaled 6,870 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, a per capita total of 17 metric tons for each resident of the Unites States. Seven years before, in 2008, the national total tonnage of carbon dioxide equivalents was eight percent greater. Our nation’s performance in the matter of GHG emissions has been one of slow, but progressive, improvement in the reduction of harmful man-made impacts on our environment. Nevertheless, AIANY members believe we can, collectively, do better.

    GHG emissions in New York City in 2014 totaled 49.1 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, an average of 5.8 metric tons per capita. Due to our extensive transit system and low private-vehicle use, the energy used in buildings accounts for 73% of those citywide emissions, well above the national average of 40% attributed to buildings. Our city has committed to reducing GHG emissions 80 percent by 2050 (the 80 x 50 initiative), to having the cleanest air of any U.S. city, to sending zero waste to landfills by 2030, to investing in contaminated land remediation, and to ensuring that all New Yorkers have more access to parks. In its role as a leading global city, New York City has been a strong voice in the international fight against climate change leading up to the adoption of the Paris Agreement at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in 2016.

    What’s at Stake:

    Although many of New York’s sustainability measures are established through our local government, federal agencies, such as the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), play a key role in regulating and impacting policy that affects our city directly. The incoming administration will have a significant influence on the continuation of policies and programs carried out at these agencies.

     

    The EPA has created a number of comprehensive federal laws, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Toxic Substances Control Act, and the Clean Power Plan. Currently under litigation, the Clean Power Plan would result in significant reductions in GHG emissions at a national level. The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a cooperative effort among northeast and mid-Atlantic states to reduce GHG emissions, New York State is set to exceed the targets of the Clean Power Plan.

     

    DOE sets efficiency standards for everything from lightbulbs to heaters and washing machines, and has taken a proactive role in the creation of stringent energy codes and strategies for achieving energy efficiency. DOE’s Energy Information Administration maintains a significant amount of data about energy use and carbon emissions, and their Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) is a vital resource for designers who seek benchmarking data. DOE promotes advanced technologies via the Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) and the National Laboratories, both of which are actively involved in projects that advance energy efficiency. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) assists the federal portfolio in achieving energy reductions and develops tools used widely in the industry. In addition, DOE has developed a suite of efforts, such as the Better Buildings Challenge, that assist localities in achieving energy efficiency targets.

    Other agencies that currently play a role in establishing policies affecting the environment include the Department of General Services, a leader in green building for the U.S. government’s portfolio; the Defense Department, which administers a portfolio of buildings and grounds with large GHG emissions and environmental impacts in the U.S. and around the world; the Department of Transportation, which helps establish and implement national priorities on transportation and infrastructure; the Department of State, which sets American policy with respect to climate change; the Department of Commerce, which, through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), provides data, tools, and information to help people understand and prepare for climate change; the Department of Health and Human Services, which can regulate the use of toxins in building materials and promote active design in the built environment; the Department of Housing and Urban Development; the National Bureau of Standards; and the National Science Foundation.

    Principles:

     

    • Human activities, including the burning of fossil fuels, are primarily responsible for the rising levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere that cause climate change and lead to extreme weather events and sea-level rise.
    • AIANY supports the Paris Agreement, which sets out a global action plan to put the world on track to avoiding dangerous climate change by limiting global warming to well below 2°C.
    • AIANY supports regulations to reduce GHG emissions.
    • AIANY supports maintaining and extending the efficiency standards for appliances and other energy codes established by the DOE.
    • Research into innovation in clean energy is essential to addressing global climate change and is integral to job creation in the U.S.
    • New York City is, and should continue to be, a national leader on urban sustainability, green building, energy efficiency, and resiliency policies. We support the city’s 80x50 initiative to reduce carbon reductions 80% by 2050 through a broad suite of programs and policies.
    • Sustainability is an integral component of the design process and should be fully integrated with all aspects of a building, including form, function, site, structure, systems, and construction. The local, state, and federal governments should serve as leaders and examples to follow with regards to the construction of energy-efficient buildings and green retrofitting.

     



    ------------------------------
    Pat Sapinsley
    Co Chair
    COTE AIANY
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 02-01-2017 11:23 AM
    Sally,

    Yours is an excellent question.  I would be pleased to work with the committee to draft a rebuttal that is written in such a way that it is completely understood and irrefutable.  Let's create a team to directly rebut President Trump's Energy (or should we say Pollution) Plan.  If you are interested and have time and/or expertise, let's do it -- let me know.

    Also, some of you may know of the efforts of a movement started by architects in Chicago, Home
    Architects Advocate remove preview
    Home
    Architects Advocate for Action on Climate Change. As architects dedicated to healthy and livable communities, and guided by scientific consensus and reason, we Advocate for action on Climate Change.
    View this on Architects Advocate >
       I encourage those reading this to sign on. 

    ------------------------------
    Helen Kessler FAIA
    President
    HJ Kessler Associates, Inc.
    Chicago IL
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 02-03-2017 12:58 PM
    Sally, I would be happy to support drafting a statement of response.  In the meantime, thank you for the link to the Architects Advocate page.

    ------------------------------
    Ludmilla Pavlova-Gillham AIA
    Senior Campus Planner
    University of Massachusetts
    Amherst MA
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 02-01-2017 11:23 AM
    I absolutely agree there should be activism around this issue and a response from COTE or the AIA in general. This energy policy is such a huge step back, it's disastrous. We can show the potential for more job creation and a brighter future forward with a Green Economy. The paragraph at the end where it talks about protecting the environment has already been shown to be a matter of interpretation at best, as Federal lands are being threatened to be turned over to States and the Keystone pipeline is being threatened to be opened back up after having already been litigated and shut down due to their environmental threat. This quote from the NRDC posted on 1/26/17:

    "Last time TransCanada made an offer to the American public it was for a project that had huge risks of water contamination, accelerated climate change, created a small number of jobs, and passed oil through the U.S. for shipment to other countries. Even if President Trump delivers on his promises to make TransCanada use American steel and the creation of some mythical number of jobs, this project is still an environmental catastrophe waiting to happen that will damage public health and further wreck our global climate.

    I for one am happy to help however I can.


    ------------------------------
    Dominique Davison AIA, Principal
    dominique@drawarch.com
    CEO, PlanIT Impact
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 02-02-2017 05:14 PM
    The "An American First Energy Plan" is a aggressive implemtation of the long standing Republican attempt to keep coal and oil the only source of energy available.  The statement to ignore and eliminate the action to reduce climate change is morally reprehensible.  The science of climate change is un-deniable and this energy plan is based on the continued lie that climate change is not caused by human activity particularly burning fossil fuels. This plan perpetuates the coal and oil industry's blackmail of the energy distribution system.
    Renewable energy sources such as wind and solar have and continue to demonsrate that they are economically sound and reliable.  These are new growing industries that can create far greater numbers of jobs than the continuation of the existing fossil fuel generating infrastructure.
    Clean coal is a slogan only.  Attempts have been made to create electricity at a cheaper cost and less pollution with no demonstrable success.  Nucular power may have a better chance of providing safe clean power but needs continual research.
    Other references to eliminating harmful regulations are equally irresponsible.  To say to continually monitor restrictions to make sure they are reasonable isn't on the table, only eliminate them.  This is a policy that rewards incompetence.
    if the American Institute of Archictect wants to continue to be a highly professional organization striving to improve our built environment we mus reject this dangerous and ill-conceived policy.
    David Howd AIA emeritus.

    ------------------------------
    David Howd AIA
    Roseville MN
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 02-03-2017 08:46 AM
    My response is that I completely agree with David Howd's and G. Mackenzie Gordon's statements. I think them for speaking out as we all must do to make our voices and wishes heard. Please contact your legislators and your friends and neighbors.

    Cheers,
    Ralph

    ------------------------------
    Ralph Bicknese AIA
    AIA, LEED AP BD+C, LEED Fellow, Principal
    Hellmuth & Bicknese Architects, LLC
    Maplewood MO
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 02-06-2017 04:35 PM

    Great comments from all. In parallel to a rebuttal letter and legislative action steps, as architects, we are uniquely qualified to leverage our expertise to create local, low energy districts in our cities. Check out  http://www.2030districts.org/ .  The larger the city the more impact YOU can have. Other important actions include divestment form fossil fuels, and participation in the AIA 2030 Commitment. 

    Lastly, lobbying the AIA Ethics Council to elevate environmental stewardship from a Cannon to a Rule has broad impact potential  because still, nine state have no energy code? https://www.energycodes.gov/status-state-energy-code-adoption

        



    ------------------------------
    Eric J. Morrow AIA
    Burlington VT
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: Is there any response to this White House "An America First Energy Plan" ?

    Posted 02-07-2017 09:45 AM
    The "An America First Energy Plan" says, "Lifting these restrictions will greatly help American workers, increasing wages by more than $30 billion over the next 7 years." Is there any credible data to support this White House statement?

    ------------------------------
    Joy Malnar AIA
    University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign, School of Architecture
    Chicago IL
    ------------------------------