View Blogs

show advanced search
search criteria = ALL

As a 30 year veteran of the architecture profession I see no way around the root fact that design with a capital ‘D’ is the primary reason buildings work or do not work.  Behind the scene decisions like how to detail and specify durable air barriers, reliable roofs, trouble free curtain walls or selecting the most durable, sustainable, or healthiest materials are essential but cannot correct for counter intuitive design decisions.  As our profession moves much faster to seek real and sustained building performance in all matters from design excellence to resilience and above all net zero energy and water use, we must pay close attention to the most important mission any architect can aspire to and that is great design.  How buildings perform is not an afterthought to be specified or detailed or built.  Thoughtful, engaged, and responsive designs based on facts confirmed and analysis performed at the outset during vision and concept studies empower the design architect to spring board far higher in to exceptional designs that will not need to be continuously remediated throughout construction drawings and construction to meet sustainability and durability goals.  The days of considering good analysis as an “early” study 

1 person recommends this.

When family has to put a loved one into an aged care home, they are often scared, confused and overwhelmed with making the right choice. When building an aged care home, you'll want to make sure the family is impressed with the facilities and will feel safe in leaving their elder family member in its care. For this reason, there's a lot to consider before the first brick gets laid. 

First Impression


The neighborhood will be the first thing that the potential resident and his or her family will see. It should be a safe area with plenty of activities. The resident will need access to community involvement whether it's a local church or a community center. A shopping center nearby as well as a local library would be great for seniors who like to be active in the community. There should be a park or other natural place for residents to visit nearby too. The grounds should have space for the residents to take a walk, or a garden for them to sit and enjoy the fresh air. The door leading up to the home should be particularly welcoming with flowers, plants and decorations that will put the family at ease.
Be the first person to recommend this.

Dear Sir:

Thank you for your kind letter. I omitted much from Chapter 6 and hope you will find that this work should be required reading for architects as well as city planners, geographers, landscape architects, real estate developers and so on. Architects must bridge the gap to public benefit with a common language capable of building credible knowledge. The architectural archives of all architects represent a treasure trove of information that must be translated and evaluated before it can be applied by architectural practitioners. I am 71 years old and was once a member of the AIA, AICP and NCARB. I agree with everything you say from a lifetime of experience and commitment. My work on the architectural algorithms for this book is done. I just have to explain it and this is taking a great deal of time.

Be the first person to recommend this.

Dear Sir:

 

You asked two very relevant questions:

 

  • ”… should we not be convincing the public of our sincerity? Maybe our efforts are misdirected and not focused on repairing the theses of LeCorbusier and Wright.”
  • “…The question in my mind is whether our professionalism has been and will continue to be compromised by out sourcing to others?”  

 

My answer to both questions is yes, and I don't mean to be impertinent. We are all reluctant to part with money if we don’t believe in benefit from the expense. It doesn’t mean that we’re right. It’s a function of perception. If the public is convinced of value, they may even be willing to mandate the service. This depends on the argument. I think you can tell that I don’t believe the argument is adequate at the present time.

Be the first person to recommend this.



The Duomo of Santa Maria del Fiore in Florence, Italy represents reason behind a strategy to achieve an owner goal, and the exceptional talent of Brunelleschi added appearance to the reason he employed. The result was shelter to serve an owner goal and solve a structural challenge that became fine art.

It was a project solution, however. Projects combine to form a Shelter Division within the Built Domain, and the new challenge is to shelter growing populations within a limited Built Domain that protects their quality and source of life - the Natural Domain. The Duomo challenges us to improve our reason and assemble symbiotic shelter one project at a time within a limited Built Domain that does not threaten its source of life. The Duomo teaches us that appearance follows reason and knowledge.

Be the first person to recommend this.

We are going to create a summer internship for an architecture student in order to expose them to non-traditional practice and hopefully plant a seed and grow the talent pool particularly for women and minorities in our area.  Does anyone have a succinct definition of non-traditional practice that is eye catching enough to convince an architecture student to see how us in the other 5% practice? 
Be the first person to recommend this.

This April 13-15 in Kansas City NIBS is hosting the fourth conference on building enclosure science and best practices known as BEST 4 (Conference Building Enclosure Science & Technology).  These are amazing events addressing the issues central to the architect’s mission of designing and delivering better buildings that last longer and perform far better than buildings ever have.  BEST is coordinated with the DOE Whole Buildings Conference and the National Building Envelope Council of Canada’s Canadian Conference on Building Science and Technology.  Especially useful is that many of the papers presented at previous BEST conferences (1, 2, and 3) are posted on the BEST site:  http://www.nibs.org/?page=best

     

 

Be the first person to recommend this.

It is a story of health. 

It started on the 9th day of Christmas in the year two thousand fifteen CE/AD. 

Heart, is a Christmas story.


The story-teller was quite under the weather for a few days preceding, with a nagging cold. In a flat overlooking the East River, really no incentive presented itself to leave the room on New Year's day, after having returned to the flat, very early, four seventeen in the morning, precisely, once the companion had left for warmer climes, on an airplane. A bit of sleep and recuperation was in order, for the relapsing cough.

Be the first person to recommend this.


Here we are again. A new year. Time to press the reset button and set noble and ambitious plans for 2015

What are yours? Lose weight. Get organized. Save money. Quit smoking. All good, but all self-oriented. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. The desire to improve one’s self and bring a certain calendrically-enhanced discipline to the pursuit is good. But have you ever made a New Year’s resolution to try to improve something outside yourself? To put a little of your considerable personal effort into serving a greater human good?  

I’d call a goal like that a New Year’s revolution.

Be the first person to recommend this.

With the state of Pennsylvania recently being the first state to enact tax credits for meeting Passive House standards, we should start to see a greater adoption of this excellent design and construction standard in the US.  The Passive House approach is reportedly ten times more energy efficient than building code requires, cuts energy use by around 90 percent, yet only adds 10-percent to the cost of a new house.  Passive House Institute US (PHIUS) is the US organization behind Passive House.  A good update on how this works in the US, which has dramatically different climate realities than the EU, can be found in this recent PHIUS presentation:  http://www.phius.org/NAPHC2014/Wright-NAPHC2014-Standards.pdf
Be the first person to recommend this.

James Jonassen FAIA
Seattle WA
-------------------------------------------
The profession as a whole and many practices demonstrate no specific purpose that resonates with potential clients.
Those practices that find, profess and live a purpose in which clients sense an intellectual, financial and emotional connection generally get respect and work from those clients.
When the architect's purpose is limited to the minimum of mandated professional responsibility and great design, defined solely in aesthetic terms, the reach of client resonance is pretty limited. Those practices which believe and act on a purpose which includes achieving a high level of intellectual,emotional and financial value for clients generally succeed.
Of course this is not profound...its just true.
1 person recommends this.

Form Follows Function
“It is the pervading law of all things organic and inorganic,
Of all things physical and metaphysical,
Of all things human, and all things super-human,
Of all true manifestations of the head,
Of the heart, of the soul,
That the life is recognizable in its expression,
That form ever follows function. This is the law.”
---Louis H. Sullivan
I was reminded again today, while reviewing a project designed from the outside in, and in which the mechanical, plumbing, and structural systems were all awkwardly configured and misaligned, how unique the Chicago perspective on architectural design is. This project annoyed me because it strayed so far from everything I’ve come to value about good architectural design from my Chicago based background. Chicago architecture, at its best, sees architecture as the interrelationship of aesthetics, structure, mechanical systems, and often the environment. In 1896 Louis Sullivan wrote, “Form ever follows function. This is the law.” This saying, which he derived from Vitruvius by way of Horatio Greenough, has been repeated so often that it is now a design cliché. Sullivan’s apprentice Frank Lloyd Wright refined it, saying “Form and Function are One.” How a building functions is governed as much by its form as its form is governed by function: Both are simultaneous, and have equal emphasis. He also said, anticipating Le Corbusier by more than two decades, “The tall modern office building is the machine pure and simple.” A building has to function efficiently to be effective architecture.
Be the first person to recommend this.

I think we are wearing this thread out, as it sounds like we are preaching to the choir. At the risk of needlessly prolonging the discussion, I feel a need to respond to Christopher Walsh's post, regarding his analogy to nurses and doctors. As an architect working in the healthcare sector, I can safely say I have never worked with a nurse who confused her or his role with that of a physician. And increasingly, we are seeing a shift in healthcare education and delivery where the physician no longer occupies the center of the universe, so to speak, but is the leader of a multidisciplinary team composed of a broad spectrum of providers (sound familiars?). Nurses play distinct but very important roles, and we are seeing more nurse practitioners, who can prescribe medications without physician oversight (though the extent of this authority varies from state to state).
Regarding licensure, I agree with Christopher about the importance of licensure. Our firm actively encourages interns to pursue their licenses and become registered. Failure to do so puts a limit on how far they can advance in the firm. However, despite this, only the partners (owners) of the firm can stamp drawings. This is due to our professional liability insurance ... we won't maintain our cover if a non-partner stamps documents. We are a 160-person firm ... maybe policies are structured differently for smaller (or larger) practices?
Be the first person to recommend this.

There was an architect, an engineer, and a musician standing on the street.
The architect turns to the others and says, "Do you think what I do is important? I don't feel like our clients care what we do."
The engineer replied, "Doesn't really matter. The inspector loved the work and blessed it all. It's safe to use, therefore, mission accomplished."
The musician looked up at both of them and said, "I've been playing this song for 10 minutes. It's a song that I've been working on for over 10 years--my personal masterpiece. And the best you guys can toss in my hat is 15 cents?"
-------------------------------------------
Rich Farris
Author of "Principles of Creativity, Architecture's Insight to Invention"
Be the first person to recommend this.

With sadness I see and read most of this discussion - post.
As everyone can see, I'm an International Associate, which means I'm not in the USA.
But I can tell you my vision of your "new" problem, the one we suffer for years here in Chile. Here we have a lot of Architectural Schools, from each one every year graduates near 80 architects (the same you call designers), and unfortunately here our Architects Association doesn't have any interest in regulate that, so all of these newly-unexperienced recently graduates come to the market and offer cheaper, mediocre and inadequate services. By law our Association can do a thing (they doesn't have interest too) about this, by contrary AIA has something like law enforcement and counselling, even they do something like lobby or pressure over congress to get some laws or initiatives. Why don't make some pressure to regulate this issue with a law, by the congress?
We architects pay a considerable amount of taxes(we help the state to get more taxes too) & insurances, we even create a large amount of employment....why the STATE doesn't protect us (you, not me)?
Ok.....I'm boring and my English isn't the best.............I know that
Be the first person to recommend this.

I agree with Mark Robin, let's face it with HGTV everyone believes they are great designers and they can do our jobs just like many nurses believe they can do what the doctors do, the difference is they can't write prescriptions so you have to see the doctor. Trying to convince the world that an Architect license means someone is a great designer will fall on deaf ears, mine included, some of the best designers I know are not licensed Architects.
The AIA needs to work on requiring a licensed Architect to stamp every plan requiring a building permit, believe me this would cause Architects to be greatly sought after and push the interns to obtain their licenses which they have no urgency to do. The one item I would add to Mark's comment would be that the AIA needs to push municipalities to require the Architects have Professional liability insurance (just like the Plumbers, Electricians, General Contractor...), this would eliminate the "Basement Architect" who undercuts the legitimate firm and keeps our fees from rising. I am baffled when I go in for a permit and the municipality doesn't require the Architect to produce their insurance certificate. If some of the insurance companies knew the homes and buildings they are insuring have an unlicensed and uninsured person designing them they should be worried, get them involved to push our initiative.
Be the first person to recommend this.

 


Fear of missing out. FOMO. It’s a thing.

A form of social anxiety, it’s that compulsion to know what other folks are doing just in case they might be having more fun than you. Anyone with a smart phone and a Facebook page has experienced it. There are real psychological drivers behind it, too. Check out Henry Murray’s Explorations in Personality and his list of psychogenic needs. FOMO is in between cognizance and sentience.

And now, I’m gonna try to use FOMO as a motivator. Here goes.

1 person recommends this.

I think the value argument hasn't work and never will. Do you go to a doctor because of value? Do you use an attorney because of value? No. Professional advise is used because we need it. There is no other reasonable choice. You cannot get medicine or medical procedures with a doctor involved. Don't go to court without a lawyer. You don't want to see what happens. We need these services to go about life.
What I am saying is all of AIA efforts should be going towards the day when any construction requiring a building permit cannot be performed without a architect. Thinks of the quality and resiliency of the built environment if architects did have a role in every building. Think about the improvement in the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Now that would be value.
Need not value is the obstacle to any sell.
-------------------------------------------
Mark Robin AIA
Mark Robin Architecture
Nashville TN
Be the first person to recommend this.


I’d like to hear more about Group 7. It also occurs to me after over 50 years of practice, that the word expert is often used in disputes, arbitration, mediation and litigation. Must we be careful as architects not to claim a global definition in relationship to humans and the built environment? Does human relationship to buildings involve architects’ expertise in ergonomics, in construction, in other physical or psychological impact which might be subject to classifying ourselves as more than we are?
Lest we forget REASONED ART is and always has been a part of architecture. Perhaps the emersion of form without function in the digital age caused us to question the idea of reason in our work. Careful we don’t encourage fewer rules, less behavioral issues and the loss of human dignity in what we suggest. Careful we don’t lose our sense of regionalism, and oh yes, scale.

Freedom of expression should not be lost, but respect for dignity and the very work HUMAN are at risk.

Bob
Be the first person to recommend this.


Mike,
In trying to "reposition" the image or role of the architect in the public's mind, I think it would be a useful exercise to understand how the public sees architects now.
You start your message by juxtaposing the architectural profession with that of Doctors, Lawyers, Engineers, and Accountants, all of which are very pragmatic professions that deal with the pragmatic concerns of the public they serve. Then you spend the rest of your message talking about the artistic and ethereal nature of architecture and design. In one fell swoop you have identified the "problem" with the public's image of architects.
The public, even the most sophisticated public, are mostly concerned with the more pragmatic concerns of their lives and of society. I don't think anyone of them would argue with the fact that architects have an artistic sensibility. But the overwhelming majority of them are more concerned with the practical nature of life. Where we as architects fall short in this "debate" with the public is in our ability to show how the profession of architecture can respond to their needs, not just their wants, or lesser still, their philosophies.
I do not see in your list of subcommittees, any listing for the economics of architecture (value vs effort), or the practical benefits of good, thoughtful design, such as comes from sustainable design (maybe in Emerging Knowledge, though not all practical benefits come from emerging knowledge). These are all more pragmatic concerns that I believe the public is concerned with, much as can be shown for Doctors, Lawyers, Engineers, and Accountants.
Be the first person to recommend this.

12345678910...