|
|
|
|
|
Robert may not feel that HSAs are the answer, but I'd suggest that they may not be the answer for him.
As a former firm principal, who got involved with the annual health insurance renewals and grimaced each year as the "really good price we negotiated with the insurer" (as the broker would tell us) was only 10% each year, being able to offer HSA plans to our employees was a GOOD thing.
Yes, you can't contribute more than the deductible each year. But, what you put in is tax-free to you, just like the premium paid by the employer is not taxed. But, having a way to set money aside, and spend it later, is a handy thing. Compare that flexibility to the un-flexible (must spend in each year, or lose it) "Flexible Spending Account".
HSAs are best suited to young folks. They can build up money in the account, and the high-deductible health insurance policy that goes along with it likely includes a few checkups, so you're not paying all of the expenses out of the account.
If you're an employee, and can cover yourself and family for $1000 a month with a HSA, or $1500 a month with a conventional plan -- well, what would you do with another $6,000 a year?
Another benefit is the fact that you can spend your HSA money on anything that shows up on the IRS's list of medical expenses. Tax Free. Your regular medical policy won't pay for everything on the IRS list, I can assure you.
------------------------------------------- Joel Niemi AIA Snohomish WA
------------------------------------------- RE:
I beg to differ. Health Savings Accounts are NOT the answer. ....
------------------------------------------- Robert Matschulat AIA
|
|
Be the first person to recommend this.
|